ThisisthestoryofwhataWoman’spatiencecanendure,andwhataMan’sresolutioncanachieve. IfthemachineryoftheLawcouldbedependedontofathomeverycaseofsuspicion,andtoconducteveryprocessofinquiry,withmoderateassistanceonlyfromthelubricatinginfluencesofoilofgold,theeventswhichfillthesepagesmighthaveclaimedtheirshareofthepublicattentioninaCourtofJustice. ButtheLawisstill,incertaininevitablecases,thepre-engagedservantofthelongpurse;andthestoryislefttobetold,forthefirsttime,inthisplace. AstheJudgemightoncehaveheardit,sotheReadershallhearitnow. Nocircumstanceofimportance,fromthebeginningtotheendofthedisclosure,shallberelatedonhearsayevidence. Whenthewriteroftheseintroductorylines(WalterHartrightbyname)happenstobemorecloselyconnectedthanotherswiththeincidentstoberecorded,hewilldescribetheminhisownperson. Whenhisexperiencefails,hewillretirefromthepositionofnarrator;andhistaskwillbecontinued,fromthepointatwhichhehasleftitoff,byotherpersonswhocanspeaktothecircumstancesundernoticefromtheirownknowledge,justasclearlyandpositivelyashehasspokenbeforethem. Thus,thestoryherepresentedwillbetoldbymorethanonepen,asthestoryofanoffenceagainstthelawsistoldinCourtbymorethanonewitness—withthesameobject,inbothcases,topresentthetruthalwaysinitsmostdirectandmostintelligibleaspect;andtotracethecourseofonecompleteseriesofevents,bymakingthepersonswhohavebeenmostcloselyconnectedwiththem,ateachsuccessivestage,relatetheirownexperience,wordforword. LetWalterHartright,teacherofdrawing,agedtwenty-eightyears,beheardfirst.