Nextdayprovedwarmandsunny,andwestartedearly,toenjoytheluxuryofagoodlongchatbeforehewouldbeobligedtoleaveme. “Thisneighbourhoodhasmorethanitsdueproportionoftheverypoor,”Iremarked,aswepassedagroupofhovels,toodilapidatedtodeservethenameof“cottages”. “Butthefewrich”,Arthurreplied,“givemorethantheirdueproportionofhelpincharity.Sothebalanceiskept.” “IsupposetheEarldoesagooddeal?” “Hegivesliberally;buthehasnotthehealthorstrengthtodomore.LadyMurieldoesmoreinthewayofschool-teachingandcottage-visitingthanshewouldlikemetoreveal.” “Thenshe,atleast,isnotoneofthe‘idlemouths’onesooftenmeetswithamongtheupperclasses. Ihavesometimesthoughttheywouldhaveahardtimeofit,ifsuddenlycalledontogivetheirraisond’être,andtoshowcausewhytheyshouldbeallowedtoliveanylonger!” “Thewholesubject”,saidArthur,“ofwhatwemaycall‘idlemouths’(Imeanpersonswhoabsorbsomeofthematerialwealthofacommunity—intheformoffood,clothes,andsoon—withoutcontributingitsequivalentintheformofproductivelabour)isacomplicatedone,nodoubt.I’vetriedtothinkitout. Anditseemedtomethatthesimplestformoftheproblem,tostartwith,isacommunitywithoutmoney,whobuyandsellbybarteronly;anditmakesityetsimplertosupposethefoodandotherthingstobecapableofkeepingformanyyearswithoutspoiling.” “Yoursisanexcellentplan,”Isaid.“Whatisyoursolutionoftheproblem?” “Thecommonesttypeof‘idlemouths’”,saidArthur,“isnodoubtduetomoneybeingleftbyparentstotheirownchildren. SoIimaginedamaneitherexceptionallyclever,orexceptionallystrongandindustrious—whohadcontributedsomuchvaluablelabourtotheneedsofthecommunitythatitsequivalent,inclothes,etc.,was(say)fivetimesasmuchasheneededforhimself. Wecannotdenyhisabsoluterighttogivethesuperfluouswealthashechooses. So,ifheleavesfourchildrenbehindhim(saytwosonsandtwodaughters),withenoughofallthenecessariesoflifetolastthemalife-time,Icannotseethatthecommunityisinanywaywrongediftheychoosetodonothinginlifebutto‘eat,drink,andbemerry’. Mostcertainly,thecommunitycouldnotfairlysay,inreferencetothem,‘ifamanwillnotwork,neitherlethimeat.’Theirreplywouldbecrushing. ‘Thelabourhasalreadybeendone,whichisafairequivalentforthefoodweareeating;andyouhavehadthebenefitofit. Onwhatprincipleofjusticecanyoudemandtwoquotasofworkforonequotaoffood?’” “Yetsurely”,Isaid,“thereissomethingwrongsomewhere,ifthesefourpeoplearewellabletodousefulworkandifthatworkisactuallyneededbythecommunityandtheyelecttositidle?” “Ithinkthereis,”saidArthur:“butitseemstometoarisefromaLawofGod—thateveryoneshalldoasmuchashecantohelpothers—andnotfromanyrightsonthepartofthecommunity,toexactlabourasanequivalentforfoodthathasalreadybeenfairlyearned.” “Isupposethesecondformoftheproblemiswheretheidlemouthspossessmoneyinsteadofmaterialwealth?” “Yes,repliedArthur:“andIthinkthesimplestcaseisthatofpaper-money. Goldisitselfaformofmaterialwealth;butabank-noteismerelyapromisetohandoversomuchmaterialwealthwhencalledupontodoso. Thefatherofthesefour‘idlemouths’,haddone(letussay)fivethousandpounds’worthofusefulworkforthecommunity. Inreturnforthis,thecommunityhadgivenhimwhatamountedtoawrittenpromisetohandover,whenevercalledupontodoso,fivethousandpounds’worthoffood,etc. Then,ifheonlyusesonethousandpounds’worthhimself,andleavestherestofthenotestohischildren,surelytheyhaveafullrighttopresentthesewrittenpromises,andtosay‘handoverthefood,forwhichtheequivalentlabourhasbeenalreadydone’. NowIthinkthiscasewellworthstating,publiclyandclearly. IshouldliketodriveitintotheheadsofthoseSocialistswhoareprimingourignorantpauperswithsuchsentimentsas‘Lookatthembloatedharistocrats! Doingnotastrokeo’workfortheirselves,andlivingonthesweatofourbrows!’ Ishouldliketoforcethemtoseethatthemoney,whichthose‘haristocrats’arespending,representssomuchlabouralreadydoneforthecommunity,andwhoseequivalent,inmaterialwealth,isduefromthecommunity.” “MightnottheSocialistsreply‘Muchofthismoneydoesnotrepresenthonestlabouratall. Ifyoucouldtraceitback,fromownertoowner,thoughyoumightbeginwithseverallegitimatesteps,suchasgifts,orbequeathingbywill,or‘valuereceived’,youwouldsoonreachanownerwhohadnomoralrighttoitbuthadgotitbyfraudorothercrimes;andofcoursehissuccessorsinthelinewouldhavenobetterrighttoitthanhehad.” “Nodoubt,nodoubt,”Arthurreplied.“Butsurelythatinvolvesthelogicalfallacyofprovingtoomuch? Itisquiteasapplicabletomaterialwealth,asitistomoney. Ifweoncebegintogobackbeyondthefactthatthepresentownerofcertainpropertycamebyithonestly,andtoaskwhetheranypreviousowner,inpastages,gotitbyfraudwouldanypropertybesecure? Afteraminute’sthought,Ifeltobligedtoadmitthetruthofthis. “Mygeneralconclusion,”Arthurcontinued,“fromthemerestandpointofhumanrights,managainstman,wasthis—thatifsomewealthy‘idlemouth’,whohascomebyhismoneyinalawfulway,eventhoughnotoneatomofthelabouritrepresentshasbeenhisowndoing,choosestospenditonhisownneeds,withoutcontributinganylabourtothecommunityfromwhomhebuyshisfoodandclothes,thatcommunityhasnorighttointerferewithhim. Butit’squiteanotherthing,whenwecometoconsiderthedivinelaw. Measuredbythatstandard,suchamanisundoubtedlydoingwrong,ifhefailstouse,forthegoodofthoseinneed,thestrengthortheskill,thatGodhasgivenhim. Thatstrengthandskilldonotbelongtothecommunity,tobepaidtothemasadebt:theydonotbelongtothemanhimself,tobeusedforhisownenjoyment:theydobelongtoGod,tobeusedaccordingtoHiswill;andwearenotleftindoubtastowhatthiswillis. ‘Dogood,andlend,hopingfornothingagain.’” “Anyhow,”Isaid,“an‘idlemouth’veryoftengivesawayagreatdealincharity.” “Inso-called‘charity’,”hecorrectedme. “ExcusemeifIseemtospeakuncharitably. Iwouldnotdreamofapplyingthetermtoanyindividual. ButIwouldsay,generally,thatamanwhogratifieseveryfancythatoccurstohim—denyinghimselfinnothing—andmerelygivestothepoorsomepart,orevenall,ofhissuperfluouswealth,isonlydeceivinghimselfifhecallsitcharity.” “But,eveningivingawaysuperfluouswealth,hemaybedenyinghimselfthemiser’spleasureinhoarding?” “Igrantyouthat,gladly,”saidArthur.“Giventhathehasthatmorbidcraving,heisdoingagooddeedinrestrainingit.” “But,eveninspendingonhimself”,Ipersisted,“ourtypicalrichmanoftendoesgood,byemployingpeoplewhowouldotherwisebeoutofwork:andthatisoftenbetterthanpauperizingthembygivingthemoney.” “I’mgladyou’vesaidthat!”saidArthur. “Iwouldnotliketoquitthesubjectwithoutexposingthetwofallaciesofthatstatement—whichhavegonesolonguncontradictedthatSocietynowacceptsitasanaxiom!” “Whatarethey?”Isaid.“Idon’tevenseeone,myself.” “Oneismerelythefallacyofambiguity—theassumptionthat’doinggood’(thatis,benefitingsomebody)isnecessarilyagoodthingtodo(thatis,arightthing). Theotheristheassumptionthat,ifoneoftwospecifiedactsisbetterthananother,itisnecessarilyagoodactinitself. Ishouldliketocallthisthefallacyofcomparison—meaningthatitassumesthatwhatiscomparativelygoodisthereforepositivelygood.” “Thenwhatisyourtestofagoodact?” “Thatitshallbeourbest,”Arthurconfidentlyreplied. “Andeventhen‘weare‘unprofitableservants’. Butletmeillustratethetwofallacies. Nothingillustratesafallacysowellasanextremecase,whichfairlycomesunderit. SupposeIfindtwochildrendrowninginapond. Irushin,andsaveoneofthechildren,andthenwalkaway,leavingtheothertodrown. ClearlyIhave’donegood’,insavingachild’slife? But—Again,supposingImeetaninoffensivestranger,andknockhimdownandwalkon. Clearlythatis’better’thanifIhadproceededtojumpuponhimandbreakhisribs?But—” “Those‘buts’arequiteunanswerable,”Isaid.“ButIshouldlikeaninstancefromreallife.” “Well,letustakeoneofthoseabominationsofmodernSociety,aCharity-Bazaar. It’saninterestingquestiontothinkout—howmuchofthemoney,thatreachestheobjectinview,isgenuinecharity;andwhethereventhatisspentinthebestway. Butthesubjectneedsregularclassification,andanalysis,tounderstanditproperly.” “Ishouldbegladtohaveitanalysed,”Isaid:“ithasoftenpuzzledme.” “Well,ifIamreallynotboringyou.LetussupposeourCharity-BazaartohavebeenorganizedtoaidthefundsofsomeHospital:andthatA,B,Cgivetheirservicesinmakingarticlestosell,andinactingassalesmen,whileX,Y,Zbuythearticles,andthemoneysopaidgoestotheHospital. “TherearetwodistinctspeciesofsuchBazaars:one,wherethepaymentexactedismerelythemarket-valueofthegoodssupplied,thatis,exactlywhatyouwouldhavetopayatashop:theother,wherefancy-pricesareasked.Wemusttaketheseseparately. “First,the‘market-value’case.HereA,B,Careexactlyinthesamepositionasordinaryshopkeepers;theonlydifferencebeingthattheygivetheproceedstotheHospital. Practically,theyaregivingtheirskilledlabourforthebenefitoftheHospital.Thisseemstometobegenuinecharity. AndIdon’tseehowtheycoulduseitbetter. ButX,Y,Zareexactlyinthesamepositionasanyordinarypurchasersofgoods. Totalkof‘charity’inconnectionwiththeirshareofthebusiness,issheernonsense.Yettheyareverylikelytodoso. “Secondly,thecaseof‘fancy-prices’.HereIthinkthesimplestplanistodividethepaymentintotwoparts,the‘market-value’andtheexcessoverthat. The‘market-value’partisonthesamefootingasinthefirstcase:theexcessisallwehavetoconsider. Well,A,B,Cdonotearnit;sowemayputthemoutofthequestion:itisagift,fromX,Y,Z,totheHospital. Andmyopinionisthatitisnotgiveninthebestway:farbetterbuywhattheychoosetobuy,andgivewhattheychoosetogive,astwoseparatetransactions:thenthereissomechancethattheirmotiveingivingmayberealcharity,insteadofamixedmotive—halfcharity,halfself-pleasing. ‘Thetrailoftheserpentisoveritall.’ AndthereforeitisthatIholdallsuchspurious‘Charities’inutterabomination!” Heendedwithunusualenergy,andsavagelybeheaded,withhisstick,atallthistleattheroad-side,behindwhichIwasstartledtoseeSylvieandBrunostanding. Icaughtathisarm,buttoolatetostophim. Whetherthestickreachedthem,ornot,Icouldnotfeelsure:atanyratetheytooknotthesmallestnoticeofit,butsmiledgaily,andnoddedtome:andIsawatoncethattheywereonlyvisibletome:the“eerie”influencehadnotreachedtoArthur. “Whydidyoutrytosaveit?”hesaid.“That’snotthewheedlingSecretaryofaCharity-Bazaar!Ionlywishitwere!”headdedgrimly. “Doesooknow,thatstickwentrightfroomyhead!”saidBruno.(Theyhadrunroundtomebythistime,andeachhadsecuredahand.)“Justundermychin!IaregladIaren’tathistle!” “Well,we’vethreshedthatsubjectout,anyhow!”Arthurresumed. “I’mafraidI’vebeentalkingtoomuch,foryourpatienceandformystrength.Imustbeturningsoon.Thisisabouttheendofmytether.” “Take,Oboatman,thricetheyfee; Spiritstwainhavecrossedwithme!” “Forutterlyinappropriateandirrelevantquotations,”laughedArthur,“youare‘ekalledbyfew,andexcelledbynone’!”Andwestrolledon. Aswepassedtheheadofthelanethatleddowntothebeach,Inoticedasinglefiguremovingslowlyalongit,seawards. Shewasagoodwayoff,andhadherbacktous:butitwasLadyMuriel,unmistakably. KnowingthatArthurhadnotseenher,ashehadbeenlooking,intheotherdirection,atagatheringrain-cloud,Imadenoremark,buttriedtothinkofsomeplausiblepretextforsendinghimbackbythesea. Theopportunityinstantlypresenteditself.“I’mgettingtired,”hesaid.“Idon’tthinkitwouldbeprudenttogofurther.Ihadbetterturnhere.” Iturnedwithhim,forafewsteps,andasweagainapproachedtheheadofthelane,Isaid,ascarelesslyasIcould,“Don’tgobackbytheroad.It’stoohotanddusty. Downthislane,andalongthebeach,isnearlyasshort;andyou’llgetabreezeoffthesea.” “Yes,IthinkIwill,”Arthurbegan;butatthatmomentwecameintosightofLadyMuriel,andhecheckedhimself.“No,it’stoofarround. Yetitcertainlywouldbecooler”Hestood,hesitating,lookingfirstonewayandthentheother—amelancholypictureofutterinfirmityofpurpose! Howlongthishumiliatingscenewouldhavecontinued,ifIhadbeentheonlyexternalinfluence,itisimpossibletosay;foratthismomentSylvie,withaswiftdecisionworthyofNapoleonhimself,tookthematterintoherownhands“Yougoanddriveher,upthisway,”shesaidtoBruno.“I’llgethimalong!” AndshetookholdofthestickthatArthurwascarrying,andgentlypulledhimdownthelane. Hewastotallyunconsciousthatanywillbuthisownwasactingonthestick,andappearedtothinkithadtakenahorizontalpositionsimplybecausehewaspointingwithit. “Arenotthoseorchisesunderthehedgethere?”hesaid.“Ithinkthatdecidesme.I’llgathersomeasIgoalong.” MeanwhileBrunohadrunonbehindLadyMuriel,and,withmuchjumpingaboutandshouting(shoutsaudibletonoonebutSylvieandmyself),muchasifheweredrivingsheep,hemanagedtoturnherroundandmakeherwalk,witheyesdemurelycastupontheground,inourdirection. Thevictorywasours!And,sinceitwasevidentthatthelovers,thusurgedtogether,mustmeetinanotherminute,Iturnedandwalkedon,hopingthatSylvieandBrunowouldfollowmyexample,asIfeltsurethatthefewerthespectatorsthebetteritwouldbeforArthurandhisgoodangel. “Andwhatsortofmeetingwasit?”Iwondered,asIpaceddreamilyon.