English
Criticismshave,however,reachedmefromprivatesources,tosomeofwhichIproposetoofferareply.
Othercriticshaveobjectedtocertaininnovationsinspelling,suchasca’n’t’,wo’n’t’,traveler’.
Inreply,Icanonlypleadmyfirmconvictionthatthepopularusageiswrong.
Astoca’n’t’,itwillnotbedisputedthat,inallotherwordsendinginn’t’,theselettersareanabbreviationofnot’;anditissurelyabsurdtosupposethat,inthissolitaryinstance,not’isrepresentedby‘’t’!
Infactcan’t’istheproperabbreviationforcanit’,justasis’t’isforisit’.
Again,inwo’n’t’,thefirstapostropheisneeded,becausethewordwould’ishereabridgedintowo’:butIholditpropertospelldon’t’withonlyoneapostrophe,becausetheworddo’isherecomplete.
Astosuchwordsastraveler’,Iholdthecorrectprincipletobe,todoubletheconsonantwhentheaccentfallsonthatsyllable;otherwisetoleaveitsingle.
Thisruleisobservedinmostcases(e.g.wedoublether’inpreferred’,butleaveitsingleinoffered’),sothatIamonlyextending,toothercases,anexistingrule.
Iadmit,however,thatIdonotspellparallel’,astherulewouldhaveit;buthereweareconstrained,bytheetymology,toinsertthedoublel’.
InthePrefacetoVol.I.,atpp.379,380,Igaveanaccountofthemaking-upofthestoryofSylvieandBruno’.AfewmoredetailsmayperhapsbeacceptabletomyReaders.
ItwasinFebruary,1885,thatIenteredintonegotiations,withMr.HarryFurniss,forillustratingthebook.
MostofthesubstanceofbothVolumeswastheninexistenceinmanuscript:andmyoriginalintentionwastopublishthewholestoryatonce.
InSeptember,1885,IreceivedfromMr.FurnissthefirstsetofdrawingsthefourwhichillustratePeterandPaul’:inNovember,1886,IreceivedthesecondsetthethreewhichillustratetheProfessor’ssongaboutthelittleman’whohadalittlegun’:andinJanuary,1887,IreceivedthethirdsetthefourwhichillustratethePig-Tale’.
ItmayinterestsomeofmyReaderstoknowthetheoryonwhichthisstoryisconstructed.
Itisanattempttoshowwhatmightpossiblyhappen,supposingthatFairiesreallyexisted;andthattheyweresometimesvisibletous,andwetothem;andthattheyweresometimesabletoassumehumanform:andsupposing,also,thathumanbeingsmightsometimesbecomeconsciousofwhatgoesonintheFairy-worldbyactualtransferenceoftheirimmaterialessence,suchaswemeetwithinEsotericBuddhism’.
(a)theordinarystate,withnoconsciousnessofthepresenceofFairies;
(c)aformoftrance,inwhich,whileunconsciousofactualsurroundings,andapparentlyasleep,he(i.e.hisimmaterialessence)migratestootherscenes,intheactualworld,orinFairyland,andisconsciousofthepresenceofFairies.
(a)theordinarystate,withnoconsciousnessofthepresenceofHumanbeings;
Iwillheretabulatethepassages,inbothVolumes,whereabnormalstatesoccur.
InthePrefacetoVol.I.,atpp.379and380,Igaveanaccountoftheoriginationofsomeoftheideasembodiedinthebook.AfewmoresuchdetailsmayperhapsinterestmyReaders:
I.p.482.Thetwoquasi-mathematicalAxioms,quotedbyArthuratp.482ofVol.
I.(Thingsthataregreaterthanthesamearegreaterthanoneanother’,andAllanglesareequal’)wereactuallyenunciated,inallseriousness,byundergraduatesatauniversitysituatednot100milesfromEly.
II.p.550.Soalsowashisremark(Iknowwhatitdoesn’tspell’).Andhisremark(Ijusttwiddledmyeyes,&c.’)Iheardfromthelipsofalittlegirl,whohadjustsolvedapuzzleIhadsether.
II.p.597.
Theremark,madebyaguestatthedinner-party,whenaskingforadishoffruit(I’vebeenwishingforthem,&c.’)IheardmadebythegreatPoet-Laureate,whoselossthewholereading-worldhassolatelyhadtodeplore.
II.p.621.
ThespeechaboutObstruction’isnomerecreatureofmyimagination!
ItiscopiedverbatimfromthecolumnsoftheStandard,andwasspokenbySirWilliamHarcourt,whowas,atthetime,amemberoftheOpposition’,attheNationalLiberalClub’,onJulythe16th,1890.
II.p.685.ThedialoguebetweenSylvieandBruno,whichoccupieslines29to34,isaverbatimreport(merelysubstitutingcake’forpenny’)ofadialogueoverheardbetweentwochildren.
MayItakethisopportunityofcallingattentiontowhatIflattermyselfwasasuccessfulpieceofname-coining,atp.400ofVol.I.
DoesnotthenameSibimet’fairlyembodythecharacteroftheSub-Warden?
ThegentleReaderhasnodoubtobservedwhatasingularlyuselessarticleinahouseabrazentrumpetis,ifyousimplyleaveitlyingabout,andneverblowit!
LittleBirds’.Events,andPersons.
2.Chancellor.
3.EmpressandSpinach(II.668).
4.Warden’sReturn.
5.Professor’sLecture(II.672).
6.OtherProfessor’sSong(I.435).
7.PettingofUggug.
8.BaronDoppelgeist.
9.JesterandBear(I.429).LittleFoxes.
10.Bruno’sDinner-Bell;LittleFoxes.
IwillpublishtheanswertothispuzzleinthePrefacetoalittlebookofOriginalGamesandPuzzles’,nowincourseofpreparation.
Ihadintended,inthisPreface,todiscussmorefully,thanIhaddoneinthepreviousVolume,theMoralityofSport’,withspecialreferencetolettersIhavereceivedfromloversofSport,inwhichtheypointoutthemanygreatadvantageswhichmengetfromit,andtrytoprovethatthesuffering,whichitinflictsonanimals,istootrivialtoberegarded.
Itis,thatGodhasgiventoMananabsoluterighttotakethelivesofotheranimals,foranyreasonablecause,suchasthesupplyoffood:butthatHehasnotgiventoMantherighttoinflictpain,unlesswhennecessary:thatmerepleasure,oradvantage,doesnotconstitutesuchanecessity:and,consequently,thatpain,inflictedforthepurposesofSport,iscruel,andthereforewrong.
ButIfinditafarmorecomplexquestionthanIhadsupposed;andthatthecase’,onthesideoftheSportsman,isamuchstrongeronethanIhadsupposed.
So,forthepresent,Isaynomoreaboutit.
IhavealreadyprotestedagainsttheassumptionthatIamreadytoendorsetheopinionsofcharactersinmystory.
But,inthesetwoinstances,IadmitthatIammuchinsympathywithArthur’.
Inmyopinion,fartoomanysermonsareexpectedfromourpreachers;and,asaconsequence,agreatmanyarepreached,whicharenotworthlisteningto;and,asaconsequenceofthat,weareveryaptnottolisten.
ThereaderofthisparagraphprobablyheardasermonlastSundaymorning?
Well,lethim,ifhecan,namethetext,andstatehowthepreachertreatedit!
FortheCongregationthisnewmovementinvolvesthedangeroflearningtothinkthattheServicesaredoneforthem;andthattheirbodilypresenceisalltheyneedcontribute.
And,forClergyandCongregationalike,itinvolvesthedangerofregardingtheseelaborateServicesasendsinthemselves,andofforgettingthattheyaresimplymeans,andtheveryhollowestofmockeries,unlesstheybearfruitinourlives.
Letmeillustratetheselasttwoformsofdanger,frommyownexperience.
Notlongago,IattendedaCathedral-Service,andwasplacedimmediatelybehindarowofmen,membersoftheChoir;andIcouldnothelpnoticingthattheytreatedtheLessonsasapartoftheServicetowhichtheyneedednottogiveanyattention,andasaffordingthemaconvenientopportunityforarrangingmusic-books,&c.,&c.AlsoIhavefrequentlyseenarowoflittlechoristers,aftermarchinginprocessiontotheirplaces,kneeldown,asifabouttopray,andrisefromtheirkneesafteraminutespentinlookingaboutthem,itbeingbuttooevidentthattheattitudewasameremockery.
Surelyitisverydangerous,forthesechildren,tothusaccustomthemtopretendtopray?
Asaninstanceofirreverenttreatmentofholythings,Iwillmentionacustom,whichnodoubtmanyofmyreadershavenoticedinChurcheswheretheClergyandChoirenterinprocession,viz.
that,attheendoftheprivatedevotions,whicharecarriedoninthevestry,andwhichareofcourseinaudibletotheCongregation,thefinalAmen’isshouted,loudenoughtobeheardallthroughtheChurch.
Thisservesasasignal,totheCongregation,topreparetorisewhentheprocessionappears:anditadmitsofnodisputethatitisforthispurposethatitisthusshouted.
WhenweremembertoWhomthatAmen’isreallyaddressed,andconsiderthatitishereusedforthesamepurposeasoneoftheChurch-bells,wemustsurelyadmitthatitisapieceofgrossirreverence?
TomeitismuchasifIweretoseeaBibleusedasafootstool.
Letmeadd,however,mostearnestly,thatIfullybelievethatthisprofanityis,inmanycases,unconscious:theenvironment’(asIhavetriedtoexplainatpp.590,591)makesallthedifferencebetweenmanandman;andIrejoicetothinkthatmanyoftheseprofanestorieswhichIfindsopainfultolistento,andshouldfeelitasintorepeatgivetotheirearsnopain,andtotheirconsciencesnoshock;andthattheycanutter,notlesssincerelythanmyself,thetwoprayers,HallowedbeThyName’,andfromhardnessofheart,andcontemptofThyWordandCommandment,GoodLord,deliverus!’
TowhichIwoulddesiretoadd,fortheirsakeandformyown,Keble’sbeautifulpetition,helpus,thisandeveryday,tolivemorenearlyaswepray!’
Itis,infact,foritsconsequencesforthegravedangers,bothtospeakerandtohearer,whichitinvolvesratherthanforwhatitisinitself,thatImournoverthisclericalhabitofprofanityinsocialtalk.
Tothebelievingheareritbringsthedangeroflossofreverenceforholythings,bythemereactoflisteningto,andenjoying,suchjests;andalsothetemptationtoretailthemfortheamusementofothers.
Totheunbelievingheareritbringsawelcomeconfirmationofhistheorythatreligionisafable,inthespectacleofitsaccreditedchampionsthusbetrayingtheirtrust.
Andtothespeakerhimselfitmustsurelybringthedangeroflossoffaith.
Forsurelysuchjests,ifutteredwithnoconsciousnessofharm,mustnecessarilybealsoutteredwithnoconsciousness,atthemoment,oftherealityofGod,asalivingbeing,whohearsallwesay.
Andhe,whoallowshimselfthehabitofthusutteringholywords,withnothoughtoftheirmeaning,isbuttoolikelytofindthat,forhim,Godhasbecomeamyth,andheavenapoeticfancythat,forhim,thelightoflifeisgone,andthatheisatheartanatheist,lostinadarknessthatmaybefelt’.
Christmas,1893.
Share this article to
FINISH