Criticismshave,however,reachedmefromprivatesources,tosomeofwhichIproposetoofferareply. Othercriticshaveobjectedtocertaininnovationsinspelling,suchas‘ca’n’t’,‘wo’n’t’,‘traveler’. Inreply,Icanonlypleadmyfirmconvictionthatthepopularusageiswrong. Asto‘ca’n’t’,itwillnotbedisputedthat,inallotherwordsendingin‘n’t’,theselettersareanabbreviationof‘not’;anditissurelyabsurdtosupposethat,inthissolitaryinstance,‘not’isrepresentedby‘’t’! Infact‘can’t’istheproperabbreviationfor‘canit’,justas‘is’t’isfor‘isit’. Again,in‘wo’n’t’,thefirstapostropheisneeded,becausetheword‘would’ishereabridgedinto‘wo’:butIholditpropertospell‘don’t’withonlyoneapostrophe,becausetheword‘do’isherecomplete. Astosuchwordsas‘traveler’,Iholdthecorrectprincipletobe,todoubletheconsonantwhentheaccentfallsonthatsyllable;otherwisetoleaveitsingle. Thisruleisobservedinmostcases(e.g.wedoublethe‘r’in‘preferred’,butleaveitsinglein‘offered’),sothatIamonlyextending,toothercases,anexistingrule. Iadmit,however,thatIdonotspell‘parallel’,astherulewouldhaveit;buthereweareconstrained,bytheetymology,toinsertthedouble‘l’. InthePrefacetoVol.I.,atpp.379,380,Igaveanaccountofthemaking-upofthestoryof‘SylvieandBruno’.AfewmoredetailsmayperhapsbeacceptabletomyReaders. ItwasinFebruary,1885,thatIenteredintonegotiations,withMr.HarryFurniss,forillustratingthebook. MostofthesubstanceofbothVolumeswastheninexistenceinmanuscript:andmyoriginalintentionwastopublishthewholestoryatonce. InSeptember,1885,IreceivedfromMr.Furnissthefirstsetofdrawings—thefourwhichillustrate‘PeterandPaul’:inNovember,1886,Ireceivedthesecondset—thethreewhichillustratetheProfessor’ssongaboutthe‘littleman’whohad‘alittlegun’:andinJanuary,1887,Ireceivedthethirdset—thefourwhichillustratethe‘Pig-Tale’. ItmayinterestsomeofmyReaderstoknowthetheoryonwhichthisstoryisconstructed. Itisanattempttoshowwhatmightpossiblyhappen,supposingthatFairiesreallyexisted;andthattheyweresometimesvisibletous,andwetothem;andthattheyweresometimesabletoassumehumanform:andsupposing,also,thathumanbeingsmightsometimesbecomeconsciousofwhatgoesonintheFairy-world—byactualtransferenceoftheirimmaterialessence,suchaswemeetwithin‘EsotericBuddhism’. (a)theordinarystate,withnoconsciousnessofthepresenceofFairies; (c)aformoftrance,inwhich,whileunconsciousofactualsurroundings,andapparentlyasleep,he(i.e.hisimmaterialessence)migratestootherscenes,intheactualworld,orinFairyland,andisconsciousofthepresenceofFairies. (a)theordinarystate,withnoconsciousnessofthepresenceofHumanbeings; Iwillheretabulatethepassages,inbothVolumes,whereabnormalstatesoccur. InthePrefacetoVol.I.,atpp.379and380,Igaveanaccountoftheoriginationofsomeoftheideasembodiedinthebook.AfewmoresuchdetailsmayperhapsinterestmyReaders: I.p.482.Thetwoquasi-mathematicalAxioms,quotedbyArthuratp.482ofVol. I.(‘Thingsthataregreaterthanthesamearegreaterthanoneanother’,and‘Allanglesareequal’)wereactuallyenunciated,inallseriousness,byundergraduatesatauniversitysituatednot100milesfromEly. II.p.550.Soalsowashisremark(‘Iknowwhatitdoesn’tspell’).Andhisremark(‘Ijusttwiddledmyeyes,&c.’)Iheardfromthelipsofalittlegirl,whohadjustsolvedapuzzleIhadsether. Theremark,madebyaguestatthedinner-party,whenaskingforadishoffruit(‘I’vebeenwishingforthem,&c.’)IheardmadebythegreatPoet-Laureate,whoselossthewholereading-worldhassolatelyhadtodeplore. Thespeechabout‘Obstruction’isnomerecreatureofmyimagination! ItiscopiedverbatimfromthecolumnsoftheStandard,andwasspokenbySirWilliamHarcourt,whowas,atthetime,amemberofthe‘Opposition’,atthe‘NationalLiberalClub’,onJulythe16th,1890. II.p.685.ThedialoguebetweenSylvieandBruno,whichoccupieslines29to34,isaverbatimreport(merelysubstituting‘cake’for‘penny’)ofadialogueoverheardbetweentwochildren. MayItakethisopportunityofcallingattentiontowhatIflattermyselfwasasuccessfulpieceofname-coining,atp.400ofVol.I. Doesnotthename‘Sibimet’fairlyembodythecharacteroftheSub-Warden? ThegentleReaderhasnodoubtobservedwhatasingularlyuselessarticleinahouseabrazentrumpetis,ifyousimplyleaveitlyingabout,andneverblowit! ‘LittleBirds’.Events,andPersons. 3.EmpressandSpinach(II.668). 5.Professor’sLecture(II.672). 6.OtherProfessor’sSong(I.435). 9.JesterandBear(I.429).LittleFoxes. 10.Bruno’sDinner-Bell;LittleFoxes. IwillpublishtheanswertothispuzzleinthePrefacetoalittlebookof‘OriginalGamesandPuzzles’,nowincourseofpreparation. Ihadintended,inthisPreface,todiscussmorefully,thanIhaddoneinthepreviousVolume,the‘MoralityofSport’,withspecialreferencetolettersIhavereceivedfromloversofSport,inwhichtheypointoutthemanygreatadvantageswhichmengetfromit,andtrytoprovethatthesuffering,whichitinflictsonanimals,istootrivialtoberegarded. Itis,thatGodhasgiventoMananabsoluterighttotakethelivesofotheranimals,foranyreasonablecause,suchasthesupplyoffood:butthatHehasnotgiventoMantherighttoinflictpain,unlesswhennecessary:thatmerepleasure,oradvantage,doesnotconstitutesuchanecessity:and,consequently,thatpain,inflictedforthepurposesofSport,iscruel,andthereforewrong. ButIfinditafarmorecomplexquestionthanIhadsupposed;andthatthe‘case’,onthesideoftheSportsman,isamuchstrongeronethanIhadsupposed. So,forthepresent,Isaynomoreaboutit. IhavealreadyprotestedagainsttheassumptionthatIamreadytoendorsetheopinionsofcharactersinmystory. But,inthesetwoinstances,IadmitthatIammuchinsympathywith‘Arthur’. Inmyopinion,fartoomanysermonsareexpectedfromourpreachers;and,asaconsequence,agreatmanyarepreached,whicharenotworthlisteningto;and,asaconsequenceofthat,weareveryaptnottolisten. ThereaderofthisparagraphprobablyheardasermonlastSundaymorning? Well,lethim,ifhecan,namethetext,andstatehowthepreachertreatedit! FortheCongregationthisnewmovementinvolvesthedangeroflearningtothinkthattheServicesaredoneforthem;andthattheirbodilypresenceisalltheyneedcontribute. And,forClergyandCongregationalike,itinvolvesthedangerofregardingtheseelaborateServicesasendsinthemselves,andofforgettingthattheyaresimplymeans,andtheveryhollowestofmockeries,unlesstheybearfruitinourlives. Letmeillustratetheselasttwoformsofdanger,frommyownexperience. Notlongago,IattendedaCathedral-Service,andwasplacedimmediatelybehindarowofmen,membersoftheChoir;andIcouldnothelpnoticingthattheytreatedtheLessonsasapartoftheServicetowhichtheyneedednottogiveanyattention,andasaffordingthemaconvenientopportunityforarrangingmusic-books,&c.,&c.AlsoIhavefrequentlyseenarowoflittlechoristers,aftermarchinginprocessiontotheirplaces,kneeldown,asifabouttopray,andrisefromtheirkneesafteraminutespentinlookingaboutthem,itbeingbuttooevidentthattheattitudewasameremockery. Surelyitisverydangerous,forthesechildren,tothusaccustomthemtopretendtopray? Asaninstanceofirreverenttreatmentofholythings,Iwillmentionacustom,whichnodoubtmanyofmyreadershavenoticedinChurcheswheretheClergyandChoirenterinprocession,viz. that,attheendoftheprivatedevotions,whicharecarriedoninthevestry,andwhichareofcourseinaudibletotheCongregation,thefinal‘Amen’isshouted,loudenoughtobeheardallthroughtheChurch. Thisservesasasignal,totheCongregation,topreparetorisewhentheprocessionappears:anditadmitsofnodisputethatitisforthispurposethatitisthusshouted. WhenweremembertoWhomthat‘Amen’isreallyaddressed,andconsiderthatitishereusedforthesamepurposeasoneoftheChurch-bells,wemustsurelyadmitthatitisapieceofgrossirreverence? TomeitismuchasifIweretoseeaBibleusedasafootstool. Letmeadd,however,mostearnestly,thatIfullybelievethatthisprofanityis,inmanycases,unconscious:the‘environment’(asIhavetriedtoexplainatpp.590,591)makesallthedifferencebetweenmanandman;andIrejoicetothinkthatmanyoftheseprofanestories—whichIfindsopainfultolistento,andshouldfeelitasintorepeat—givetotheirearsnopain,andtotheirconsciencesnoshock;andthattheycanutter,notlesssincerelythanmyself,thetwoprayers,‘HallowedbeThyName’,and‘fromhardnessofheart,andcontemptofThyWordandCommandment,GoodLord,deliverus!’ TowhichIwoulddesiretoadd,fortheirsakeandformyown,Keble’sbeautifulpetition,‘helpus,thisandeveryday,tolivemorenearlyaswepray!’ Itis,infact,foritsconsequences—forthegravedangers,bothtospeakerandtohearer,whichitinvolves—ratherthanforwhatitisinitself,thatImournoverthisclericalhabitofprofanityinsocialtalk. Tothebelievingheareritbringsthedangeroflossofreverenceforholythings,bythemereactoflisteningto,andenjoying,suchjests;andalsothetemptationtoretailthemfortheamusementofothers. Totheunbelievingheareritbringsawelcomeconfirmationofhistheorythatreligionisafable,inthespectacleofitsaccreditedchampionsthusbetrayingtheirtrust. Andtothespeakerhimselfitmustsurelybringthedangeroflossoffaith. Forsurelysuchjests,ifutteredwithnoconsciousnessofharm,mustnecessarilybealsoutteredwithnoconsciousness,atthemoment,oftherealityofGod,asalivingbeing,whohearsallwesay. Andhe,whoallowshimselfthehabitofthusutteringholywords,withnothoughtoftheirmeaning,isbuttoolikelytofindthat,forhim,Godhasbecomeamyth,andheavenapoeticfancy—that,forhim,thelightoflifeisgone,andthatheisatheartanatheist,lostin‘adarknessthatmaybefelt’.